Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

5 Real-world Blockchain Use-cases in Insurance Industry

Nearly 80% of insurance executives have either already adopted or planning to pilot blockchain technology across their business units. The level of trust, transparency, and immutability that blockchain (distributed ledger technology) provides is impeccable. 

blockchain insurance use cases- benefits

Blockchain offers an independently verifiable dataset so that insurers, as well as customers, need not suffer from decisions based on inappropriate/incomplete information. In the instances of travel insurance, blockchain-based systems use external data sources to validate whether a flight was missed or canceled. Accordingly, insurers can decide on processing refund claims. Well, blockchain can handle even more complex situations of road accidents by accurately determining the vehicle or human fault.

The 5 practical blockchain use-cases in the insurance industry are-

  1. Fraud detection
  2. IoT & Blockchain together to structure data
  3. Multiple risk participation/Reinsurance
  4. On-demand insurance
  5. Microinsurance

Fraud Detection

In the US alone, every year fraudulent claims account for more than $40 billion, which is excluding health insurance. Despite digitization, the standard methods fail to recognize fraud. Blockchain can help in fraud detection and prevention to a great extent. 

Blockchain ensures that all the executed transactions are permanent and timestamped. I.e. no one, including insurers, can modify the data preventing any kind of breaches. This data can further help in defining patterns of fraudulent transactions, which insurers can use in their fraud prevention algorithms. 

Fraud detection using blockchain use case: Etherisc

Powered by smart contracts, Etherisc independently verifies claims by using multiple data sources. For example, for crop insurance claims, it compares satellite images, weather reports, and drone images with the image provided by the claimant. 

IoT & Blockchain together to structure data

As IoT will connect more and more devices, the amount of data generated from each of the devices will increase significantly. For instance, there were 26.66 billion active IoT devices in 2019 and nearly 127 IoT devices connect to the internet every second

This data is extremely valuable for insurers to develop accurate actuarial models and usage-based insurance models. Considering the auto insurance sector, the data collected about driving time, distances, acceleration, breaking patterns, and other behavioral statistics can identify high-risk drivers. 

But, the question is — how to manage the enormous data as millions of devices are communicating every second. 

And the answer is a blockchain!

It allows users (insurers) to manage large and complex networks on a peer-to-peer basis. Instead of building expensive data centers, blockchain offers a decentralized platform to store and process data. 

Multiple risk participation/Reinsurance

Reinsurance is insurance for insurers. It protects the insurers when large volumes of claims come in. 

Also read – 5 biggest insurance claims payouts in history

Because of information silos and lengthy processes, the current reinsurance system is highly inefficient. Blockchain can bring twofold advantages to reinsurers. One — unbreached records for accurate claims analysis and two — speeding-up the process through automated data/information sharing. PwC estimates that blockchain can help the reinsurance industry save up to $10 billion by improving operational efficiency.

For example, in 2017, B3i (a consortium for exploring blockchain in insurance) launched a smart contract management system for Property Cat XOL contracts. It is a type of reinsurance for catastrophe insurance.

On-demand insurance

On-demand insurance is a flexible insurance model, where policyholders can turn on and off their insurance policies in just a click. More the interactions with policy documents, the greater the hassle to manage the records. 

For instance, on-demand insurance requires underwriting, policy documents, buyers records, costing, risk, claims, and so on much more than traditional insurance policies.

But, thanks to blockchain technology, maintaining ledgers (records) has become simpler. On-demand insurance players can leverage blockchain for efficient record-keeping from the inception of the policy until its disposal. An interesting blockchain insurance use cases is that of Ryskex — a German InsurTech, founded in 2018. It provides blockchain-powered insurance platform to B2B insurers to transfer risks faster and more transparently. 

Microinsurance

Instead of an all-encompassing insurance policy, microinsurance offers security against specific perils for regular premium payments, which are far less than regular insurances. Microinsurance policies deliver profits only when distributed in huge volumes. However, because of low profit-margin and high distribution cost, despite immediate benefits, microinsurance policies don’t get the deserved traction. 

Blockchain can offer a parametric insurance platform. With this, insurers will need fewer local agents and “oracles” can replace adjusters on the ground. For example, Surity.ai uses blockchain to offer microinsurance to the Asian populace, especially those not having access to the services of banks or other financial organizations. 

For further queries around blockchain / insurance use cases, please feel free to drop us a word at hello@mantralabsglobal.com.

Related blockchain articles – 

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot