Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

The Million-Dollar AI Mistake: What 80% of Enterprises Get Wrong

By :

When we hear million-dollar AI mistakes, the first thought is: What could it be? Was it a massive investment in the wrong technology? Did a critical AI application go up in flames? Or was it an overhyped solution that failed to deliver on its promises? Spoiler alert: it’s often all of these—and more. From overlooked data science issues to misaligned business goals and poorly defined AI projects, failures are a mix of preventable errors.

Remember Blockbuster? They had multiple chances to embrace advanced technology like streaming but stuck to their old model, ignoring the shifting landscape. The result? Netflix became a giant while Blockbuster faded into history. AI failures follow a similar pattern—when businesses fail to adapt their processes, even the most innovative AI tools turn into liabilities. Gartner reports nearly 80% of AI projects fail, costing millions. How do companies, with all their resources and brainpower manage to bungle something as transformative as AI?

1. Investing Without a Clear Goal

Enterprises often treat artificial intelligence as a must-have accessory rather than a strategic tool. “If our competitors have it, we need it too!” they exclaim, rushing into adoption without asking why. The result? Expensive systems that yield no measurable business outcomes. Without aligning AI’s capabilities—like natural language processing or generative AI solutions—with goals such as boosting customer experience or driving operational efficiency, AI becomes just another line item in the budget.

2. Data Woes

AI is only as smart as the data it’s fed. Yet, many enterprises underestimate the importance of clean, structured, and unbiased data. They plug in inconsistent or incomplete data and expect groundbreaking insights. The result? AI models that churn out unreliable or even harmful outcomes.

Case in Point: A faulty ATS filtered for outdated AngularJS skills, rejecting all applicants, including a manager’s fake CV. The error, unnoticed due to blind reliance on AI, cost the HR team their jobs—a stark reminder that human oversight is critical in AI systems.

3. Underestimating the Human Element

AI might be powerful, but it does not replace human judgment.  Whether it’s an AI assistant like Claude AI or OpenAI’s ChatGPT API, Enterprises often overlook the need for human oversight and fail to train employees on how to interact with AI systems. What you get is either blind trust in algorithms or complete resistance from employees, both of which spell trouble.

4. Stuck in Experiment Mode

AI adoption often stagnates when businesses fixate on piloting instead of scaling. Tools like DALL-E or MidJourney may excel in proofs of concept but lack enterprise-wide integration. This leaves companies in an endless cycle of testing AI applications, wasting resources without realizing full-scale business value.

5. Ignoring Change Management

Transitioning to AI technology is as much about organizational culture as it is about deploying AI models. Mismanagement, such as overlooking ethical AI considerations or failing to explain AI’s impact on roles, leads to resistance. Whether it’s a small chatbot AI tool or full-scale AI automation, fostering employee buy-in is critical.

Source: IBM

How to Avoid These Pitfalls

  1. Start with Strategy: Define clear objectives for adopting artificial intelligence programs.
  2. Invest in Data: Build a robust data infrastructure. Clean, unbiased, and relevant data is the foundation of any successful AI initiative.
  3. Prioritize Education and Oversight: Train teams to work with AI and establish clear guidelines for human-AI collaboration.
  4. Think Big, but Scale Smart: Start with pilots but plan to expand AI in finance, healthcare, operations or other areas from day one.
  5. Focus on Change Management: Communicate the value of tools like AI robots or AI-driven insights to teams at all levels.

Graph of AI adoption across different countries

Source:IBM.com

Mantra Labs is Your AI Partner for Success

At Mantra Labs, we don’t just offer AI solutions—we provide a comprehensive, end-to-end strategy to help businesses adopt the complex process of AI implementation. While implementing AI can lead to transformative outcomes, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. True success lies in aligning the right technology with your unique business needs, and that’s where we excel. Whether you’re leveraging AI in healthcare with tools like poly AI or exploring AI trading platforms, we craft custom solutions tailored to your needs.

By addressing challenges like biased AI algorithms or misaligned AI strategies, we ensure you sidestep costly pitfalls. Our approach not only simplifies AI adoption but transforms it into a competitive advantage. Ready to avoid the million-dollar mistake and unlock AI’s full potential? Let’s make it happen—together.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot