Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

Importance of Design Systems: Enhancing Product Quality and Speed

Technology leaders such as Apple, IMB, Google, and Atlassian rely on design systems to codify and scale design efforts across entire organizations. However, it’s important to note that design systems are not exclusive to well-known brands; in fact, a study conducted by Forrester in 2020 revealed that 65% of the companies surveyed have integrated design systems into their workflows.

What is a design system?

A design system is a comprehensive collection of design guidelines, principles, components, and assets that are created and maintained to ensure consistency and cohesion in the visual and user interface design of a product or brand. It serves as a centralized resource that helps design and development teams create a unified and coherent user experience across various platforms and devices.

A design system consists of:

  • Pattern library
  • Design tokens
  • Components
  • Brand guidelines
  • Documentation 

Why is having a design system important?

A design system provides numerous benefits to organizations, design and development teams, and end users. Here are some key reasons why having a design system is essential:

  • Consistency: Design systems ensure a consistent and cohesive look and feel across a product or brand. This consistency builds trust with users and creates a recognizable and professional identity.
  • Efficiency: Design systems save time and resources by providing pre-defined design components and guidelines. Designers and developers can reuse established elements, reducing the need to recreate design assets from scratch.
  • Productivity: With reusable components and clear guidelines, design and development teams can work more efficiently, reducing the time required for decision-making and development iterations.
  • Scalability: Design systems allow for easy scaling as a product or brand grows. New features, pages, or products can be created while maintaining a consistent design, saving time and effort.
  • Improved Collaboration: Design systems promote collaboration between designers and developers. By speaking a common design language and using shared components and guidelines, teams can work together more effectively.
  • Accessibility: Design systems often include accessibility guidelines, ensuring that products are designed and built with inclusivity in mind, making them usable by a broader range of people.
  • User Experience: A well-designed system leads to a better user experience. Consistency and familiarity make it easier for users to navigate and interact with a product or brand.
  • Brand Identity: Design systems help maintain a strong and coherent brand identity. This is crucial for branding and marketing efforts, as it reinforces brand recognition and loyalty.
  • Rapid Prototyping: Design systems facilitate quick prototyping and testing, as designers can focus on the overall experience and functionality, knowing that the visual design is consistent.
  • Adaptability: Design systems can be updated to accommodate changes in design trends, new technology, or user feedback, allowing products and brands to evolve without losing their core identity.
  • Documentation: Clear and detailed documentation explaining how to use the design system’s components and guidelines. This is crucial for ensuring that designers and developers can easily implement the system.
  • Version Control: A system for managing changes and updates to the design system to ensure that all team members are using the most current version.
  • Cost Savings: By reducing design and development redundancy, design systems can save money in the long run, making projects more cost-effective.
  • Maintainability: A well-maintained design system ensures that design elements are updated consistently, reducing the risk of visual and functional inconsistencies.

Examples of Design systems:

Conclusion

Design systems are a cost-effective solution for organizations, as they formalize design choices that can be easily replicated on a larger scale. There are specific ways in which these systems expedite the design and development processes, and maximize the benefits of your design system. For businesses, it streamlines workflows, ensures consistency, enhances efficiency and productivity, reduces costs, and contributes to increased ROI and revenue. Furthermore, it forms the foundation for the successful execution of marketing initiatives and overall brand development.

However, there are challenges associated with the implementation of a design system. It requires a commitment to making it a top priority, comprehensive planning, active involvement of all departments across various domains, and thorough testing to meet current standards. Additionally, it’s essential to recognize that this is an ongoing project that will continually need fine-tuning, regular maintenance, governance, and the addition of new essential elements and features to stay current and aligned with industry trends.

In the end, the effort is well worth it. Many companies that have established their brand design systems report accelerated growth and a substantial increase in revenue due to embracing this concept.

About the Author: Ashish is a Lead Designer at Mantra Labs. He helps clients make better decisions on their digital products with his expertise in UI/UX design.

Want to know more about UI/UX design?

Read our Latest blog!

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot