Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

How is Automation Testing Effective in Defect-Free Delivery?

By :

Testing is a method to validate if the delivered product is developed as per the requirement and if the expected functionality is achieved. There are two types of testing methods namely Manual and Automation.

Manual testing is validating manually for defects in the developed product. This requires time and more resources and delays the testing process as well. 

Automation Testing is a process where the product is tested using scripts, testing tools, or any framework to minimize manual intervention, human errors, and time. This is the best way to deliver the developed product in a short duration. But how is automation testing effective in Defect-Free Delivery? 

In this article, we will talk about the pros and cons of automation testing and delivering the developed product defect-free.

Automation Testing could be utilized to carry out Regression Testing, Load Testing, Performance Testing, and Repeated Execution for faster results.

It does not serve as a substitute for manual testing since some testing types, such as exploratory testing, usability testing, and ad-hoc testing, require manual verification to get the best results.

Why Automation Testing?

  • It is less time-consuming.
  • A list of consecutive sets of test cases called suites can be developed and executed any number of times.
  • On Regression testing, human error is eliminated.
  • Automation testing is best for Load and performance testing and repeated testing.
  • It is best for optimized use of the test scripts for different versions of the application.
  • Can be done even when a small modification is done to code on test suite execution.

Automation Testing Vs. Manual Testing

Automation testing is not required in all places, the decision has to be taken when to use manual or automation. When there is repeated testing of the scenarios to reduce repeated manual effort on execution, automation testing is required and when there is less repetition and the scripting takes a huge effort, then manual testing is the best.

Pros of Automation

  • Can be done to run repeated testing
  • Execution can be performed for the same scenario but with different inputs
  • Execution can be performed in various triggering points at the same time
  • To increase the accuracy and for quick test results.

Cons of Automation

  • Automation takes more effort in the beginning
  • There are some factors like visual appearances that cannot be automated
  • Maintenance of scripts is required when any updation takes place

Pros of Manual

  • Team interaction improvises between developers and testers.
  • Best suited for Ad-hoc testing

Cons of Manual

  • Requires more human resources
  • Delayed results in case of repeated testing
  • More occurrences of human errors
  • Depends on the resources’ presence while executing. 

Types of Automation Testing

  • Keyword-driven testing.
  • Integration testing.
  • Unit testing.
  • Smoke testing.
  • Regression testing.
  • Performance testing.
  • Security testing.
  • Data-driven testing.

Test automation life cycle

There are many phases/steps involved in the automation test life cycle:

  • Test planning
  • Analyse application under test
  • Setup test environment
  • Develop test scripts
  • Enhance test scripts
  • Debug the tests
  • Execute the tests
  • Analyze the test results
  • Defects/Reports

Implementing A Test Automation Strategy 

  • Define the Scope Of Automation
  • Decide On Testing Approach
  • Select A Test Automation Framework
  • Choose The Automation Tool To Use
  • Test Execution
  • Test Automation Maintenance 

Conclusion

Automation testing reduces time, and resources and also provides accurate results.

While it may help organizations deliver a great product defect-free and stay competitive, it has its own challenges. It can be difficult at first, but with the appropriate procedures and actions, it could be implemented successfully.

About The Author: 

Saranya N S is currently working in Mantra Labs as a QA manager. She has experience in multiple domains like telecom, IVR, and BFSI and is passionate about creating automation testing frameworks.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot