Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

Designing for Web 3.0

3 minutes 46 seconds read

We’ve discussed blockchain, Metaverse, and  Mixed Reality in our previous blogs showcasing perspectives from different industries on how this virtual world is helping businesses to boost customer experience.

But in order to give an exceptional user experience, it is imperative to know what its target audience wants in terms of design. What will be the role of design in web 3.0 and what will be the challenges in creating a good design for these users?

Since the 1990s the internet world has evolved three times: web 1.0 (1990-2004), web 2.0(2004-Current), & Web 3.0 ( New ). 

Web 3.0 includes modern internet technologies such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), & Metaverse (AR, VR & Mixed Reality). 

Web Trends

The newer target customers – millennials and Generation Z (also known as Internet Generation) are living in Web 3.0. Their life revolves around technology. What they want is a smarter and more intelligent experience. In the world of Web 3.0, customer experience (CX) is based on user recommendations, automatic chatbots, and advanced search results leveraging machine learning, improved connectivity etc. 

Comparison between Web 2.0 and Web 3.0

Image Credit: Navdeep Yadav 

Renowned companies like JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Gucci, Coca Cola are dabbling in the Metaverse.

“According to citi report, the Metaverse could be an $8-13 trillion dollar market by 2030.”

Metaverse Taxonomy

Metaverse taxonomy

Why should you care about ‘Web 3.0’ when designing?

Traction follows the money. That is why huge companies are interested in it. In order to give a web immersive experience to the current audience, we need to understand how designers can create web 3.0 experiences for the audience.

Web 3.0

Design is at the forefront of global transition with a newer set of customer expectations driving the market. The challenges in designing for the metaverse (VR, AR & MR) are numerous, as there is no clearly defined solution. Here are a few points to keep in mind while designing for Web 3.0 users:

Design for Blockchain: For the design industry, there is no clarity about how designers can adapt to web3.0 trends for giving a better user experience. However, some industry leaders suggest that to develop a web 3.0 site, one must first understand blockchain technology from a design perspective, such as the challenges this technology can present. Because the audience is not aware of the blockchain’s advantages & limitations. 

Designers can create web experiences by considering: visitors’ attention, simplifying complex elements, designing unique visual elements, maintaining a brand identity, and other things.

Design for VR: When a designer creates a VR experience for the users it is necessary to create a good immersive experience. Even though there is no final standard design guideline in the industry, what can be useful while designing is understanding people and the platform you design for, visualizing the interaction keeping user convenience at the center, considering head tracking, preventing motion sickness, and creating a guideline for the user.

Design for AR: While designing for AR, understanding the actual problem and ensuring that AR is the right channel to solve the problem, with clear business and user objectives is necessary. Another important thing is to understand the hardware capabilities. When you start designing the visual, don’t limit yourself to rectangles because in the AR experience users have a complete real-world environment.

Design for MR: Mixed Reality is a great change in the new internet world & designing for Mixed reality is a challenging job for designers. You can consider some UX principles while designing,

  • Provide your users with instinctual interactions through hand, eye, and voice inputs,
  • Learn how to interact with holograms at close range with a user’s hands or at long range with precise interactions,
  • Use voice commands as input in your immersive apps to control surrounding holograms and environments,
  • Add a new level of context and human understanding to a holographic experience by using information about what your users are looking at

Conclusion:

According to Gartner, 25% of people will spend at least one hour a day in the metaverse for work, shopping, education, social, and/or entertainment, by 2026. 

Today’s new-age customers feel more comfortable interacting and socializing with their peers in the virtual space and the new internet space is offering immersive experiences to people. This new trend has not been fully adopted by the whole world yet, but the pandemic has accelerated its adoption, and industries and users are looking at Web 3.0 as a new opportunity to transact and interact. To remain competitive, designers need to understand, learn, explore and observe more closely this evolving web world to create a better design for today’s users.

About the Author:

Praduman is a self-taught, passionate designer at Mantra Labs’ UI/UX team. His focus is on designing user-friendly interfaces using human-centered principles. Currently he is exploring how the metaverse affects human psychology. He loves to listen to podcasts and read current affairs.

Want to know more about the latest in Blockchain?

Read our blog: Solana: The next in Blockchain

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot