Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

Can NFTs be insured, and who carries the risk?

Nike and RTFKT launched Nike CryptoKicks in the beginning of the year which is a collection of NFT sneakers called the “RFTKT X Nike Dunk Genesis,”. Owners can personalize these sneakers using ‘skin vials’ from different designers by adding new patterns and effects such as flashing lights and floating swooshes. Some of the NFT sneakers have already fetched more than $100,000. With so much spending in the NFT space, the biggest question that needs to be answered is ‘Can NFTs be insured?’

Nike CryptoKicks

The Past and Present

The first NFT-Quantum was published in 2014, but the NFT world has gained a lot of traction in the past year. The Merge created by an anonymous digital artist Pak was sold for a record-breaking $91.8 million in December’21, making it the most expensive Non-Fungible token (NFT) transaction to date. Beeple’s latest masterpiece artwork was sold for $69 million. 

The Merge

According to NFT stats compiled by Chainalysis Inc., the NFT marketplace grew to almost $41 billion in 2021, closing in on conventional art sales. 

The Scam Game

According to a report in Decrypt, the designers of the Big Daddy Ape Club scammed investors out of $1.13 million, making it the largest ‘rug pull’ in Solana blockchain’s history.

Recently, an attacker hacked into the Instagram account of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) and stole about $3 million in NFTs. The hacker used a phishing link to steal tokens from victims’ cryptocurrency wallets. 

Non-Fungible Tokens can’t be traded interchangeably due to their unique numbers and codes. Because NFTs are so expensive, hackers and scammers have been actively eyeing the NFT world for their monetary gains. For buyers, digital security has become a serious concern.

Ensuring digital assets is an absolute necessity now, so the question here is whether NFTs can also be insured? The answer is, yes. Buyers may get compensated for fraudulent activities in the following situations:

a)In case, the private key is lost by the owner.

–When an NFT is created, it has dual keys: private and public. The blockchain ledger maintains the public key whereas the private key acts as proof of ownership.

b)When scammers sell replicas and fake digital assets.

c)Damages caused by intervention on the blockchain.

What’s happening in the NFT Insurance space?

Coincover provides corporate and consumer protection for NFTs through an insurance-backed solution. The company protects its partners’ wallets and the NFTs they possess from hacking, phishing, and other illegal activity, while also providing an insurance-backed guarantee in the event that something goes wrong. This is in addition to their disaster recovery service, which is a backup key recovery service that allows NFTs to be recovered in the event of lost passwords.

Due to increased demand from NFT holders seeking security against hacking and theft, Hong Kong-based virtual insurer OneDegree has teamed up with Munich Re to insure digital assets.

Recently, Amulet has secured $6m in its first funding round to provide insurance coverage in the Web 3.0 world which includes NFTs as well. The first Rust-based decentralized finance (DeFi) insurance protocol will utilize Solana’s PoS network to provide insurance service and stable returns. Using its unique Protocol Controlled Underwriting and Future Yield Backed Claim mechanisms, the firm will reduce the risk for underwriting capital providers.

The Challenges

A report by Technavio predicts that the NFT market will grow by $147.24 billion from 2021 to 2026 at a CAGR of 35.27%. With this growing demand for NFTs, there is a pressing need for NFT protection in the virtual world. Ensuring an NFT would be very different from insuring a conventional product or service. Insurers have three key challenges that they need to address when it comes to insuring NFTs:

  1. Uncertainty is involved in the valuation of NFTs since there isn’t any fixed market price. 
  2. Lack of structured and unified legal framework for ensuring NFTs.
  3. Ambiguity in the scope of the risks associated with NFTs is compounded by the fact that technology is evolving at a rapid pace.

The Road Ahead

The dynamics of the NFT market has changed in the past few months. After witnessing a fall in the NFT prices, user expectations have also changed dramatically where NFT utility is the latest lookout for the NFT customers. One of the most common utility is NFT being used as a gaming asset. Be it an art NFT or utility NFT, its loss may have serious repercussions not just for the owner, but also for the entire ecosystem, as NFT may lose its value if it is not secured. Open Sea – the world’s largest NFT marketplace lost $1.7 million worth of NFTs due to a phishing attack. A Bengaluru-based caricature artist found that one of his artworks was listed on Open Sea, without his knowledge. The media and insurance companies have been paying close attention to massive losses like these. NFT owners and creators will seek insurance to protect them as they become more aware of the risks involved in owning digital assets. With pioneers such as Coincover and Amulet leading the way, it’d be intriguing to see how the development unfolds in the NFT insurance space.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot