Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

Business Continuity for Call-Center Operations: Case Study

3 minutes, 39 seconds read

Coronavirus outbreak has led to prolonged lockdown in several countries, which has crippled many back-office operations. The Government of India imposed a nationwide lockdown (currently 40 days). Because of travel restrictions and health concerns, customer queries are increasing exponentially. Companies dependent on call-centres are struggling to deploy work from home solutions and their business continuity plans. 

Most companies are not prepared for work-from-home arrangements, but there are exceptions. Those with the right strategy and timely action are able to keep their business operationally afloat. Before we delve into the case study, let’s take a quick look at the current situation of call centres.

COVID-19 is testing call-centre businesses. How?

Voice-services are facing a tough time transitioning to a work-from-home model. Companies are not willing to allow access to private and sensitive data outside of the protected office premises. 

Teleperformance, a specialized omnichannel customer experience management company, was able to allow mobility to only 50% of its employees by the first week of April (2nd week of lockdown). The company aims at managing 66% of operations remotely by mid-April. 

This raises a question — why not 100%?

Most of the companies lack the digital infrastructure and a rigid business continuity plan. For instance, the airline business relies heavily on call-centres. After coronavirus outbreaks and resulting lockdowns, most of the call-centres failed to respond to increasing customer queries. To continue communication with customers and support them in whatever ways possible, many airports turned to social media. Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport had over 3.5 million social media engagements during the period.

But, what’s the major limiting factor for adopting virtual call-centre models?

Virtual call-centre adoption challenges

Theoretically, technology can simplify call-centre operations with mobility solutions. But mobility requires an uninterrupted internet connection and developing countries like India struggles for it. Telcos are surely rushing to fill the gaps in customer communications; the fact is— only 2-3% of Indians use wired broadband and the majority of users rely on mobile data. 

The Telcos infrastructure here is designed and built to operate on 75% network capacity utilization. But, due to lockdown, many cities are witnessing 90-100% load capacity and circles like Karnataka are stretching beyond 100% capacity. The country’s inadequate telcos facility is also a limiting factor for setting up virtual call-centres.

Migrating from traditional to virtual operations (ensuring workplace mobility) will require moving the core systems to the cloud. During times like this, the frailed supply-chain defies the thought of procuring devices to achieve 100% mobility.

Despite the aforementioned challenges, some voice-service extensive organizations managed to seamlessly implement mobility at work. 

[Related: Enterprises investing in Workplace Mobility Can Survive Pandemics]

Ensuring call-centre business continuity during a lockdown: a case study

India’s Leading Health Insurer— Religare demonstrated its preparedness against the COVID-19 situation. A major part of the insurer’s customer servicing relies on call-centre based communication, which would have become operationally impossible amidst the ongoing lockdown. To respond to this critical situation and remain operationally afloat, Mantra implemented a call-centre mobility solution with quick turn-around time.

In a typical call centre, the team leader manages and supports callers to handle customer queries. Now that the workforce is operating remotely, the critical question before the company was how to make information available to the callers.

A new virtual call-centre (computer telephony/dialer) system was implemented in the organization’s Lead Management System, which manages the complete customer journey. Through this cloud-based solution, the necessary information is always available to the caller, also eliminating dependencies. 

Companies are sceptical to allow access to private data outside of on-premise systems. To ensure information security and privacy, the new call centre application allowed only required caller IPs, service APIs and Dialer APIs for remote access to the platform.

[Related: The impact of COVID-19 on the global economy and insurance]

Merits of the case

40% of businesses do not reopen after a disaster. Of those who do, 25% reopen and fail. The main reason is firms are unprepared to withstand the short and long term effects of severe business disruptions. 

That’s why leaders emphasize on business continuity plans (BCP).
The benefits of BCP abstracts to –

  1. Protecting the safety of employees.
  2. Maintaining customer service by minimizing interruptions of business operations.
  3. Protecting assets and brand.
  4. Preventing environmental contamination.
  5. Protecting the investment and leveraging the chance to survive and thrive post-disaster.

To secure operational continuity, organizations need to proactively invest in digital workplaces that remain virtually uninterrupted even during Pandemics. 

Do you need help in ensuring business continuity? We’re listening to you. Write to us at hello@mantralabsglobal.com.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot