Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(43)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(66)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(7)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(143)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(19)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

How we used RetinaNet for dense shape detection in live imagery

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have come a long way in conveniently identifying objects in images and videos. Networks like VGG19, ResNet, YOLO, SSD, R-CNN, DensepathNet, DualNet, Xception, Inception, PolyNet, MobileNet, and many more have evolved over time. Their range of applications lies in detecting space availability in a parking lot, satellite image analysis to track ships and agricultural output, radiology, people count, detecting words in vehicle license plates and storefronts, circuits/machinery fault analysis, medical diagnosis, etc.

Facebook AI Research (FAIR) has recently published RetinaNet architecture which uses Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) with ResNet. This architecture demonstrates higher accuracy in situations where speed is not really important. RetinaNet is built on top of FPN using ResNet.

Comparing tradeoff between speed and accuracy of different CNNs

Google offers benchmark comparison to calculate tradeoff between speed and accuracy of various networks using MS COCO dataset to train the models in TensorFlow. It gives us a benchmark to understand the best model that provides a balance between speed and accuracy. According to researchers, Faster R-CNN is more accurate, whereas R-FCN and FCN show better inference time (i.e. their speed is higher). Inception and ResNet are implementations of Faster R-CNN. MobileNet is an implementation of SSD.

Faster R-CNN implementations show an overall mAP (mean average precision) of around 30, which is highest for feature extraction. And, at the same time, its accuracy is also highest at around 80.5%. MobileNet R-FCN implementation has a lower mAP of around 15. Therefore, its accuracy drops down to about 71.5%. 

Thus, we can say — SSD implementations work best for detecting larger objects whereas, Faster R-CNN and R-FCN are better at detecting small objects.

speed and accuracy of various CNNs

On the COCO dataset, Faster R-CNN has average mAP for IoU (intersection-over-union) from 0.5 to 0.95 (mAP@[0.5, 0.95]) as 21.9% . R-FCN has mAP of 31.5% . SSD300 and SSD512 have mAPs of 23.2 and 26.8 respectively . YOLO-V2 is at 21.6% whereas YOLO-V3 is at 33% . FPN delivers 33.9% . RetinaNet stands highest at 40.8%.

RetinaNet- AP vs speed comparison
The two variations of RetinaNet are compared above for AP vs speed (ms) for inference.

One-stage detector vs two-stage detectors for shape detection

A One-stage detector scans for candidate objects sampled for around 100000 locations in the image that densely covers the spatial extent. This does not let the class balance between background and foreground. 

A Two-stage detector first narrows down the number of candidate objects on up to 2000 locations and separates them from the background in the first stage. It then classifies each candidate object in the second stage, thus managing the class balance. But, because of the smaller number of locations in the sample, many objects might escape detection. 

Faster R-CNN is an implementation of the two-stage detector. RetinaNet, an implementation of one stage detector addresses this class imbalance and efficiently detects all objects.

Focal Loss: a new loss function

This function focuses on training on hard negatives. It is defined as-

focal loss function

Where,

focal loss function

and p = sigmoid output score.

The greeks are hyperparameters.


When a sample classification is inappropriate and pₜ is small, it does not affect the loss. Gamma is a focusing parameter and adjusts the rate at which the easy samples are down-weighted. Samples get down-weighted when their classification is inappropriate and pₜ is close to 1. When gamma is 0, the focal loss is close to the cross-entropy loss. Upon increasing gamma, the effect of modulating factor also increases.

RetinaNet Backbone

The new loss function called Focal loss increases the accuracy significantly. Essentially it is a one-stage detector Feature Pyramid Network with Focal loss replacing the cross-entropy loss. 

Hard negative mining in a single shot detector and Faster R-CNN addresses the class imbalance by downsampling the dominant samples. On the contrary, RetinaNet addresses it by changing the weights in the loss function. The following diagram explains the architecture.

RetinaNet architecture

Here, deep feature extraction uses ResNet. Using FPN on top of ResNet further helps in constructing a multi-scale feature pyramid from a single resolution image. FPN is fast to compute and works efficiently on multiscale.

Results

We used ResNet50-FPN pre-trained on MS COCO to identify humans in the photo. The threshold is set above a score of 0.5. The following images show the result with markings and confidence values.

Dense shape detection
Human shape detection

We further tried to detect other objects like chairs.

RetinaNet object detection

Conclusion: It’s great to know that training on the COCO dataset can detect objects from unknown scenes. The object detection in the scenes took 5-7 seconds. So far, we have put filters of human or chair in results. RetinaNet can detect all the identifiable objects in the scene.

Multiple objects detection using RetinaNet

The different objects detected with their score are listed below-

human0.74903154
human0.7123633
laptop0.69287986
human0.68936586
bottle0.67716646
human0.66410005
human0.5968385
chair0.5855772
human0.5802317
bottle0.5792091
chair0.5783555
chair0.538948
human0.52267283

Next, we will be interested in working on a model good in detecting objects in the larger depth of the image, which the current ResNet50-FPN could not do.

About author: Harsh Vardhan is a Tech Lead in the Development Department of Mantra Labs. He is integral to AI-based development and deployment of projects at Mantra Labs.

General FAQs

What is RetinaNet?

RetinaNet is a type of CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) architecture published by Facebook AI Research also known as FAIR. It uses the Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) with ResNet. RetinaNet is widely used for detecting objects in live imagery (real-time monitoring systems). This architecture demonstrates a high-level of accuracy, but with a little compromise in speed. In the experiment we conducted, it took 5-7 seconds for object detection in live scenes.Dense shape detection - RetinaNet

What is RetinaNet Model?

RetinaNet model comprises of a backbone network and two task-specific sub-networks. The backbone network is a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) built on ResNet. It is responsible for computing a convolution feature (object) from the input imagery. The two subnetworks are responsible for the classification and box regression, i.e. one subnet predicts the possibility of the object being present at a particular spatial location and the other subnetwork outputs the object location for the anchor box.

What is Focal Loss?

The focal loss function focuses on training on hard negatives. In other words, the focal loss function is an algorithm for improving Average Precision (AP) in single-stage object detectors. It is defined as-RetinaNet focal loss function

What is SSD Network?

Single Shot Detector (SSD) can detect multiple objects in an image in a single shot, hence the name. 
The beauty of SSD networks is that it predicts the boundaries itself and has no assigned region proposal network. SSD networks can predict the boundary boxes and classes from feature maps in just one pass by using small convolutional filters.

Glossary of Terms related to convolutional neural networks

CNN

Deep Learning uses Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for analyzing visual imagery. It consists of an input and output layer and multiple intermediate layers. In CNN programming, the input is called a tensor, which is usually an image or a video frame. It passes through the convolutional layer forming an abstract feature map identifying different shapes.

R-CNN

The process of combining region proposals with CNN is called as R-CNN. Region proposals are the smaller parts of the original image that have a probability of containing the desired shape/object. The R-CNN algorithm creates several region proposals and each of them goes to the CNN network for better dense shape detection.

ResNet

Residual Neural Network (ResNet) utilizes skip connections to jump over some layers. Classical CNNs do not perform when the depth of the network increases beyond a certain threshold. Most of the ResNet models are implemented with double or triple layer skips with batch normalization in between. ResNet helps in the training of deeper networks.

YOLO

You only look once (YOLO) is a real-time object detection system. It is faster than most other neural networks for detecting shapes and objects. Unlike other systems, it applies neural network functions to the entire image, optimizing the detection performance.

FAIR

It is Facebook’s AI Research arm for understanding the nature of intelligence and creating intelligent machines. The main research areas at FAIR include Computer Vision, Conversational AI, Integrity, Natural Language Processing, Ranking and Recommendations, System Research, Theory, Speech & Audio, and Human & Machine Intelligence.

FPN

Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) is a feature extractor designed for achieving speed and accuracy in detecting objects or shapes. It generates multiple feature map layers with better quality information for object detection.

COCO Dataset

Common Objects in Context (COCO) is a large-scale dataset for detecting, segmenting, and captioning any object. 

FCN

Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) transforms the height and width of the intermediate layer (feature map) back to the original size so that predictions have a one-to-one correspondence with the input image. 

R-FCN

R-FCN corresponds to a region-based fully convolutional network. It is mainly used for feature detection. R-FCN comprises region-based feature maps that are independent of region proposals (ROI) and carry computation outside of ROIs. It is much simpler and about 20 times faster than R-CNN. 

TensorFlow

It is an open-source software library developed by Google Brain for a range of dataflow and differential programming applications. It is also useful in neural network programming. 

Also read – How are Medical Images shared among Healthcare Enterprises



Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Why Netflix Broke Itself: Was It Success Rewritten Through Platform Engineering?

By :

Let’s take a trip back in time—2008. Netflix was nothing like the media juggernaut it is today. Back then, they were a DVD-rental-by-mail service trying to go digital. But here’s the kicker: they hit a major pitfall. The internet was booming, and people were binge-watching shows like never before, but Netflix’s infrastructure couldn’t handle the load. Their single, massive system—what techies call a “monolith”—was creaking under pressure. Slow load times and buffering wheels plagued the experience, a nightmare for any platform or app development company trying to scale

That’s when Netflix decided to do something wild—they broke their monolith into smaller pieces. It was microservices, the tech equivalent of turning one giant pizza into bite-sized slices. Instead of one colossal system doing everything from streaming to recommendations, each piece of Netflix’s architecture became a specialist—one service handled streaming, another handled recommendations, another managed user data, and so on.

But microservices alone weren’t enough. What if one slice of pizza burns? Would the rest of the meal be ruined? Netflix wasn’t about to let a burnt crust take down the whole operation. That’s when they introduced the Circuit Breaker Pattern—just like a home electrical circuit that prevents a total blackout when one fuse blows. Their famous Hystrix tool allowed services to fail without taking down the entire platform. 

Fast-forward to today: Netflix isn’t just serving you movie marathons, it’s a digital powerhouse, an icon in platform engineering; it’s deploying new code thousands of times per day without breaking a sweat. They handle 208 million subscribers streaming over 1 billion hours of content every week. Trends in Platform engineering transformed Netflix into an application dev platform with self-service capabilities, supporting app developers and fostering a culture of continuous deployment.

Did Netflix bring order to chaos?

Netflix didn’t just solve its own problem. They blazed the trail for a movement: platform engineering. Now, every company wants a piece of that action. What Netflix did was essentially build an internal platform that developers could innovate without dealing with infrastructure headaches, a dream scenario for any application developer or app development company seeking seamless workflows.

And it’s not just for the big players like Netflix anymore. Across industries, companies are using platform engineering to create Internal Developer Platforms (IDPs)—one-stop shops for mobile application developers to create, test, and deploy apps without waiting on traditional IT. According to Gartner, 80% of organizations will adopt platform engineering by 2025 because it makes everything faster and more efficient, a game-changer for any mobile app developer or development software firm.

All anybody has to do is to make sure the tools are actually connected and working together. To make the most of it. That’s where modern trends like self-service platforms and composable architectures come in. You build, you scale, you innovate.achieving what mobile app dev and web-based development needs And all without breaking a sweat.

Source: getport.io

Is Mantra Labs Redefining Platform Engineering?

We didn’t just learn from Netflix’s playbook; we’re writing our own chapters in platform engineering. One example of this? Our work with one of India’s leading private-sector general insurance companies.

Their existing DevOps system was like Netflix’s old monolith: complex, clunky, and slowing them down. Multiple teams, diverse workflows, and a lack of standardization were crippling their ability to innovate. Worse yet, they were stuck in a ticket-driven approach, which led to reactive fixes rather than proactive growth. Observability gaps meant they were often solving the wrong problems, without any real insight into what was happening under the hood.

That’s where Mantra Labs stepped in. Mantra Labs brought in the pillars of platform engineering:

Standardization: We unified their workflows, creating a single source of truth for teams across the board.

Customization:  Our tailored platform engineering approach addressed the unique demands of their various application development teams.

Traceability: With better observability tools, they could now track their workflows, giving them real-time insights into system health and potential bottlenecks—an essential feature for web and app development and agile software development.

We didn’t just slap a band-aid on the problem; we overhauled their entire infrastructure. By centralizing infrastructure management and removing the ticket-driven chaos, we gave them a self-service platform—where teams could deploy new code without waiting in line. The results? Faster workflows, better adoption of tools, and an infrastructure ready for future growth.

But we didn’t stop there. We solved the critical observability gaps—providing real-time data that helped the insurance giant avoid potential pitfalls before they happened. With our approach, they no longer had to “hope” that things would go right. They could see it happening in real-time which is a major advantage in cross-platform mobile application development and cloud-based web hosting.

The Future of Platform Engineering: What’s Next?

As we look forward, platform engineering will continue to drive innovation, enabling companies to build scalable, resilient systems that adapt to future challenges—whether it’s AI-driven automation or self-healing platforms.

If you’re ready to make the leap into platform engineering, Mantra Labs is here to guide you. Whether you’re aiming for smoother workflows, enhanced observability, or scalable infrastructure, we’ve got the tools and expertise to get you there.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot