Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(44)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(67)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(8)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(146)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(21)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

How we used RetinaNet for dense shape detection in live imagery

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have come a long way in conveniently identifying objects in images and videos. Networks like VGG19, ResNet, YOLO, SSD, R-CNN, DensepathNet, DualNet, Xception, Inception, PolyNet, MobileNet, and many more have evolved over time. Their range of applications lies in detecting space availability in a parking lot, satellite image analysis to track ships and agricultural output, radiology, people count, detecting words in vehicle license plates and storefronts, circuits/machinery fault analysis, medical diagnosis, etc.

Facebook AI Research (FAIR) has recently published RetinaNet architecture which uses Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) with ResNet. This architecture demonstrates higher accuracy in situations where speed is not really important. RetinaNet is built on top of FPN using ResNet.

Comparing tradeoff between speed and accuracy of different CNNs

Google offers benchmark comparison to calculate tradeoff between speed and accuracy of various networks using MS COCO dataset to train the models in TensorFlow. It gives us a benchmark to understand the best model that provides a balance between speed and accuracy. According to researchers, Faster R-CNN is more accurate, whereas R-FCN and FCN show better inference time (i.e. their speed is higher). Inception and ResNet are implementations of Faster R-CNN. MobileNet is an implementation of SSD.

Faster R-CNN implementations show an overall mAP (mean average precision) of around 30, which is highest for feature extraction. And, at the same time, its accuracy is also highest at around 80.5%. MobileNet R-FCN implementation has a lower mAP of around 15. Therefore, its accuracy drops down to about 71.5%. 

Thus, we can say — SSD implementations work best for detecting larger objects whereas, Faster R-CNN and R-FCN are better at detecting small objects.

speed and accuracy of various CNNs

On the COCO dataset, Faster R-CNN has average mAP for IoU (intersection-over-union) from 0.5 to 0.95 (mAP@[0.5, 0.95]) as 21.9% . R-FCN has mAP of 31.5% . SSD300 and SSD512 have mAPs of 23.2 and 26.8 respectively . YOLO-V2 is at 21.6% whereas YOLO-V3 is at 33% . FPN delivers 33.9% . RetinaNet stands highest at 40.8%.

RetinaNet- AP vs speed comparison
The two variations of RetinaNet are compared above for AP vs speed (ms) for inference.

One-stage detector vs two-stage detectors for shape detection

A One-stage detector scans for candidate objects sampled for around 100000 locations in the image that densely covers the spatial extent. This does not let the class balance between background and foreground. 

A Two-stage detector first narrows down the number of candidate objects on up to 2000 locations and separates them from the background in the first stage. It then classifies each candidate object in the second stage, thus managing the class balance. But, because of the smaller number of locations in the sample, many objects might escape detection. 

Faster R-CNN is an implementation of the two-stage detector. RetinaNet, an implementation of one stage detector addresses this class imbalance and efficiently detects all objects.

Focal Loss: a new loss function

This function focuses on training on hard negatives. It is defined as-

focal loss function

Where,

focal loss function

and p = sigmoid output score.

The greeks are hyperparameters.


When a sample classification is inappropriate and pₜ is small, it does not affect the loss. Gamma is a focusing parameter and adjusts the rate at which the easy samples are down-weighted. Samples get down-weighted when their classification is inappropriate and pₜ is close to 1. When gamma is 0, the focal loss is close to the cross-entropy loss. Upon increasing gamma, the effect of modulating factor also increases.

RetinaNet Backbone

The new loss function called Focal loss increases the accuracy significantly. Essentially it is a one-stage detector Feature Pyramid Network with Focal loss replacing the cross-entropy loss. 

Hard negative mining in a single shot detector and Faster R-CNN addresses the class imbalance by downsampling the dominant samples. On the contrary, RetinaNet addresses it by changing the weights in the loss function. The following diagram explains the architecture.

RetinaNet architecture

Here, deep feature extraction uses ResNet. Using FPN on top of ResNet further helps in constructing a multi-scale feature pyramid from a single resolution image. FPN is fast to compute and works efficiently on multiscale.

Results

We used ResNet50-FPN pre-trained on MS COCO to identify humans in the photo. The threshold is set above a score of 0.5. The following images show the result with markings and confidence values.

Dense shape detection
Human shape detection

We further tried to detect other objects like chairs.

RetinaNet object detection

Conclusion: It’s great to know that training on the COCO dataset can detect objects from unknown scenes. The object detection in the scenes took 5-7 seconds. So far, we have put filters of human or chair in results. RetinaNet can detect all the identifiable objects in the scene.

Multiple objects detection using RetinaNet

The different objects detected with their score are listed below-

human0.74903154
human0.7123633
laptop0.69287986
human0.68936586
bottle0.67716646
human0.66410005
human0.5968385
chair0.5855772
human0.5802317
bottle0.5792091
chair0.5783555
chair0.538948
human0.52267283

Next, we will be interested in working on a model good in detecting objects in the larger depth of the image, which the current ResNet50-FPN could not do.

About author: Harsh Vardhan is a Tech Lead in the Development Department of Mantra Labs. He is integral to AI-based development and deployment of projects at Mantra Labs.

General FAQs

What is RetinaNet?

RetinaNet is a type of CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) architecture published by Facebook AI Research also known as FAIR. It uses the Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) with ResNet. RetinaNet is widely used for detecting objects in live imagery (real-time monitoring systems). This architecture demonstrates a high-level of accuracy, but with a little compromise in speed. In the experiment we conducted, it took 5-7 seconds for object detection in live scenes.Dense shape detection - RetinaNet

What is RetinaNet Model?

RetinaNet model comprises of a backbone network and two task-specific sub-networks. The backbone network is a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) built on ResNet. It is responsible for computing a convolution feature (object) from the input imagery. The two subnetworks are responsible for the classification and box regression, i.e. one subnet predicts the possibility of the object being present at a particular spatial location and the other subnetwork outputs the object location for the anchor box.

What is Focal Loss?

The focal loss function focuses on training on hard negatives. In other words, the focal loss function is an algorithm for improving Average Precision (AP) in single-stage object detectors. It is defined as-RetinaNet focal loss function

What is SSD Network?

Single Shot Detector (SSD) can detect multiple objects in an image in a single shot, hence the name. 
The beauty of SSD networks is that it predicts the boundaries itself and has no assigned region proposal network. SSD networks can predict the boundary boxes and classes from feature maps in just one pass by using small convolutional filters.

Glossary of Terms related to convolutional neural networks

CNN

Deep Learning uses Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for analyzing visual imagery. It consists of an input and output layer and multiple intermediate layers. In CNN programming, the input is called a tensor, which is usually an image or a video frame. It passes through the convolutional layer forming an abstract feature map identifying different shapes.

R-CNN

The process of combining region proposals with CNN is called as R-CNN. Region proposals are the smaller parts of the original image that have a probability of containing the desired shape/object. The R-CNN algorithm creates several region proposals and each of them goes to the CNN network for better dense shape detection.

ResNet

Residual Neural Network (ResNet) utilizes skip connections to jump over some layers. Classical CNNs do not perform when the depth of the network increases beyond a certain threshold. Most of the ResNet models are implemented with double or triple layer skips with batch normalization in between. ResNet helps in the training of deeper networks.

YOLO

You only look once (YOLO) is a real-time object detection system. It is faster than most other neural networks for detecting shapes and objects. Unlike other systems, it applies neural network functions to the entire image, optimizing the detection performance.

FAIR

It is Facebook’s AI Research arm for understanding the nature of intelligence and creating intelligent machines. The main research areas at FAIR include Computer Vision, Conversational AI, Integrity, Natural Language Processing, Ranking and Recommendations, System Research, Theory, Speech & Audio, and Human & Machine Intelligence.

FPN

Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) is a feature extractor designed for achieving speed and accuracy in detecting objects or shapes. It generates multiple feature map layers with better quality information for object detection.

COCO Dataset

Common Objects in Context (COCO) is a large-scale dataset for detecting, segmenting, and captioning any object. 

FCN

Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) transforms the height and width of the intermediate layer (feature map) back to the original size so that predictions have a one-to-one correspondence with the input image. 

R-FCN

R-FCN corresponds to a region-based fully convolutional network. It is mainly used for feature detection. R-FCN comprises region-based feature maps that are independent of region proposals (ROI) and carry computation outside of ROIs. It is much simpler and about 20 times faster than R-CNN. 

TensorFlow

It is an open-source software library developed by Google Brain for a range of dataflow and differential programming applications. It is also useful in neural network programming. 

Also read – How are Medical Images shared among Healthcare Enterprises



Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Lake, Lakehouse, or Warehouse? Picking the Perfect Data Playground

By :

In 1997, the world watched in awe as IBM’s Deep Blue, a machine designed to play chess, defeated world champion Garry Kasparov. This moment wasn’t just a milestone for technology; it was a profound demonstration of data’s potential. Deep Blue analyzed millions of structured moves to anticipate outcomes. But imagine if it had access to unstructured data—Kasparov’s interviews, emotions, and instinctive reactions. Would the game have unfolded differently?

This historic clash mirrors today’s challenge in data architectures: leveraging structured, unstructured, and hybrid data systems to stay ahead. Let’s explore the nuances between Data Warehouses, Data Lakes, and Data Lakehouses—and uncover how they empower organizations to make game-changing decisions.

Deep Blue’s triumph was rooted in its ability to process structured data—moves on the chessboard, sequences of play, and pre-defined rules. Similarly, in the business world, structured data forms the backbone of decision-making. Customer transaction histories, financial ledgers, and inventory records are the “chess moves” of enterprises, neatly organized into rows and columns, ready for analysis. But as businesses grew, so did their need for a system that could not only store this structured data but also transform it into actionable insights efficiently. This need birthed the data warehouse.

Why was Data Warehouse the Best Move on the Board?

Data warehouses act as the strategic command centers for enterprises. By employing a schema-on-write approach, they ensure data is cleaned, validated, and formatted before storage. This guarantees high accuracy and consistency, making them indispensable for industries like finance and healthcare. For instance, global banks rely on data warehouses to calculate real-time risk assessments or detect fraud—a necessity when billions of transactions are processed daily, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake Data Warehouse, and Azure Data Warehouse are vital. Similarly, hospitals use them to streamline patient care by integrating records, billing, and treatment plans into unified dashboards.

The impact is evident: according to a report by Global Market Insights, the global data warehouse market is projected to reach $30.4 billion by 2025, driven by the growing demand for business intelligence and real-time analytics. Yet, much like Deep Blue’s limitations in analyzing Kasparov’s emotional state, data warehouses face challenges when encountering data that doesn’t fit neatly into predefined schemas.

The question remains—what happens when businesses need to explore data outside these structured confines? The next evolution takes us to the flexible and expansive realm of data lakes, designed to embrace unstructured chaos.

The True Depth of Data Lakes 

While structured data lays the foundation for traditional analytics, the modern business environment is far more complex, organizations today recognize the untapped potential in unstructured and semi-structured data. Social media conversations, customer reviews, IoT sensor feeds, audio recordings, and video content—these are the modern equivalents of Kasparov’s instinctive reactions and emotional expressions. They hold valuable insights but exist in forms that defy the rigid schemas of data warehouses.

Data lake is the system designed to embrace this chaos. Unlike warehouses, which demand structure upfront, data lakes operate on a schema-on-read approach, storing raw data in its native format until it’s needed for analysis. This flexibility makes data lakes ideal for capturing unstructured and semi-structured information. For example, Netflix uses data lakes to ingest billions of daily streaming logs, combining semi-structured metadata with unstructured viewing behaviors to deliver hyper-personalized recommendations. Similarly, Tesla stores vast amounts of raw sensor data from its autonomous vehicles in data lakes to train machine learning models.

However, this openness comes with challenges. Without proper governance, data lakes risk devolving into “data swamps,” where valuable insights are buried under poorly cataloged, duplicated, or irrelevant information. Forrester analysts estimate that 60%-73% of enterprise data goes unused for analytics, highlighting the governance gap in traditional lake implementations.

Is the Data Lakehouse the Best of Both Worlds?

This gap gave rise to the data lakehouse, a hybrid approach that marries the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of warehouses. The lakehouse supports both structured and unstructured data, enabling real-time querying for business intelligence (BI) while also accommodating AI/ML workloads. Tools like Databricks Lakehouse and Snowflake Lakehouse integrate features like ACID transactions and unified metadata layers, ensuring data remains clean, compliant, and accessible.

Retailers, for instance, use lakehouses to analyze customer behavior in real time while simultaneously training AI models for predictive recommendations. Streaming services like Disney+ integrate structured subscriber data with unstructured viewing habits, enhancing personalization and engagement. In manufacturing, lakehouses process vast IoT sensor data alongside operational records, predicting maintenance needs and reducing downtime. According to a report by Databricks, organizations implementing lakehouse architectures have achieved up to 40% cost reductions and accelerated insights, proving their value as a future-ready data solution.

As businesses navigate this evolving data ecosystem, the choice between these architectures depends on their unique needs. Below is a comparison table highlighting the key attributes of data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses:

FeatureData WarehouseData LakeData Lakehouse
Data TypeStructuredStructured, Semi-Structured, UnstructuredBoth
Schema ApproachSchema-on-WriteSchema-on-ReadBoth
Query PerformanceOptimized for BISlower; requires specialized toolsHigh performance for both BI and AI
AccessibilityEasy for analysts with SQL toolsRequires technical expertiseAccessible to both analysts and data scientists
Cost EfficiencyHighLowModerate
ScalabilityLimitedHighHigh
GovernanceStrongWeakStrong
Use CasesBI, ComplianceAI/ML, Data ExplorationReal-Time Analytics, Unified Workloads
Best Fit ForFinance, HealthcareMedia, IoT, ResearchRetail, E-commerce, Multi-Industry
Conclusion

The interplay between data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses is a tale of adaptation and convergence. Just as IBM’s Deep Blue showcased the power of structured data but left questions about unstructured insights, businesses today must decide how to harness the vast potential of their data. From tools like Azure Data Lake, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake Data Warehouse to advanced platforms like Databricks Lakehouse, the possibilities are limitless.

Ultimately, the path forward depends on an organization’s specific goals—whether optimizing BI, exploring AI/ML, or achieving unified analytics. The synergy of data engineering, data analytics, and database activity monitoring ensures that insights are not just generated but are actionable. To accelerate AI transformation journeys for evolving organizations, leveraging cutting-edge platforms like Snowflake combined with deep expertise is crucial.

At Mantra Labs, we specialize in crafting tailored data science and engineering solutions that empower businesses to achieve their analytics goals. Our experience with platforms like Snowflake and our deep domain expertise makes us the ideal partner for driving data-driven innovation and unlocking the next wave of growth for your enterprise.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot