Try : Insurtech, Application Development

AgriTech(1)

Augmented Reality(20)

Clean Tech(8)

Customer Journey(17)

Design(43)

Solar Industry(8)

User Experience(66)

Edtech(10)

Events(34)

HR Tech(3)

Interviews(10)

Life@mantra(11)

Logistics(5)

Strategy(18)

Testing(9)

Android(48)

Backend(32)

Dev Ops(11)

Enterprise Solution(29)

Technology Modernization(7)

Frontend(29)

iOS(43)

Javascript(15)

AI in Insurance(38)

Insurtech(66)

Product Innovation(57)

Solutions(22)

E-health(12)

HealthTech(24)

mHealth(5)

Telehealth Care(4)

Telemedicine(5)

Artificial Intelligence(143)

Bitcoin(8)

Blockchain(19)

Cognitive Computing(7)

Computer Vision(8)

Data Science(19)

FinTech(51)

Banking(7)

Intelligent Automation(27)

Machine Learning(47)

Natural Language Processing(14)

expand Menu Filters

Can Itsio replace Kubernetes?

I often see people getting confused between Istio and Kubernetes due to their overlapping areas of functionality in the context of cloud-native development and deployment but serving different purposes within that ecosystem. 

 Areas of Confusion:

  • Area of Operation:
    • Both Istio and Kubernetes function within the cloud-native ecosystem, leading to confusion about their roles.
  • Service Management vs. Container Orchestration:
    • Kubernetes automates containerized application deployment, scaling, and management.
    • Istio controls how different application components share data, adding a layer of networking management atop Kubernetes.
  • Functionality Overlap:
    • While both offer networking and service discovery features, Istio provides advanced traffic management capabilities not native to Kubernetes.
  • Microservices Architecture:
    • Often discussed in microservices contexts, leading to misconceptions about interchangeability. In reality, they are complementary, with Kubernetes providing infrastructure and deployment capabilities, while Istio offers tools for intercommunication and management.
  • Learning Curve and Complexity:
    • Both Kubernetes and Istio are complex technologies, and without hands-on experience, users may blur distinctions between orchestration layers and service meshes.

We have to understand that Istio is a Service Mesh and is not a replacement for Kubernetes. Instead, it complements Kubernetes’ capabilities by providing a sophisticated layer for managing service-to-service communication within microservices architectures. Using Istio with Kubernetes allows organizations to build and deploy scalable, secure, and resilient applications by leveraging the strengths of both technologies.

Understanding the core purpose of each—Kubernetes for container orchestration and Istio for service-to-service communication in a microservices architecture—helps clarify their roles in modern application deployment and management. While they can be used independently, leveraging them together allows developers to build, deploy, and manage highly scalable, resilient, and secure applications in cloud-native environments.

Purpose and Functionality of Kubernetes

Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform designed to automate containerized applications’ deployment, scaling, and management. It provides the infrastructure for running these applications across a cluster of machines, handling tasks such as container scheduling, scaling, networking, and management of stateful or stateless applications.

Purpose and Functionality of Itsio

Istio, on the other hand, is a service mesh that provides a transparent layer for managing, securing, and monitoring the communication between microservices. It operates at the application level, offering features like traffic management, service discovery, load balancing, TLS encryption, and observability for microservices.

How they are Complementary Technologies

  • Istio works with Kubernetes (and other orchestration systems) by adding a control layer that manages the communication between services that Kubernetes runs. Istio’s service mesh is designed to work on a Kubernetes cluster to provide the additional networking capabilities that Kubernetes doesn’t offer natively.
  • Kubernetes manages containers, not the traffic between them. While Kubernetes can perform basic network functions like load balancing and port mapping, it doesn’t provide advanced traffic management features (e.g., canary deployments, circuit breaking) or end-to-end encryption for service-to-service communication that Istio does.

Key Differences

Feature/AspectItsioKubernetes
Primary FocusEnhancing service-to-service communication within microservices architecturesContainer orchestration and management of containerized applications
ScopeOperates at the application level, managing network traffic between servicesOperates at the infrastructure level, managing containers and nodes
Key FeaturesFine-grained traffic control (routing, canary releases, A/B testing)Service discoverySecure service-to-service communication (mTLS)Observability (tracing, monitoring, logging)Network resilience (retries, timeouts, circuit breaking)Automated deployment, scaling, and management of containersService discovery and load balancingAutomated rollouts and rollbacksSelf-healing capabilities (restarts failed containers)Configuration management
Main ComponentsSidecar proxies (e.g., Envoy), Control Plane (e.g., Istio Control Plane)Pods, Nodes, Services, Deployments, ReplicaSets, StatefulSets, DaemonSets
Security FeaturesPrimarily focuses on secure communication between services using encryption and strong identityManages container-level security policies, network policies, and access control
Traffic ManagementProvides advanced traffic management capabilities for microservices communicationProvides basic load balancing and optionally integrates with Ingress controllers for external traffic management
Use CasesIdeal for complex microservices architectures requiring detailed control over service interactionsIdeal for automating deployment, scaling, and operations of containerized applications, regardless of their architecture
IntegrationDesigned to integrate with Kubernetes and other container orchestration systemsIdeal for automating deployment, scaling, and operations of containerized applications, regardless of their architecture
IntegrationDesigned to integrate with Kubernetes and other container orchestration systemsCan be used standalone or with other cloud-native tools, including Service Meshes like Istio for advanced networking features
ImplementationIdeal for complex microservices architectures requiring detailed control over service interactionsProvides the runtime environment and management capabilities for running containerized applications

In conclusion, it’s crucial to recognize that Istio and Kubernetes serve distinct yet complementary roles within the cloud-native ecosystem. While confusion may arise due to overlapping functionalities, understanding their core purposes helps elucidate their roles in modern application deployment and management.

By understanding the core purposes of Kubernetes and Istio, developers can leverage them effectively to build highly scalable, resilient, and secure applications in cloud-native environments. While they can be used independently, combining Kubernetes with Istio allows organizations to take advantage of both technologies’ strengths, enhancing application deployment and management capabilities.

About the Author:

Kumar Sambhav Singh, the Chief Technology Officer of Mantra Labs is a passionate technologist who loves to explore the latest trends & technologies in the market. He holds 18+ years of experience in building Enterprise Products & Solutions for some of the most renowned organizations in the world including Intel Inc.

Further Reading: Architecting Tomorrow: Navigating the Landscape of Technology Modernization

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Why Netflix Broke Itself: Was It Success Rewritten Through Platform Engineering?

By :

Let’s take a trip back in time—2008. Netflix was nothing like the media juggernaut it is today. Back then, they were a DVD-rental-by-mail service trying to go digital. But here’s the kicker: they hit a major pitfall. The internet was booming, and people were binge-watching shows like never before, but Netflix’s infrastructure couldn’t handle the load. Their single, massive system—what techies call a “monolith”—was creaking under pressure. Slow load times and buffering wheels plagued the experience, a nightmare for any platform or app development company trying to scale

That’s when Netflix decided to do something wild—they broke their monolith into smaller pieces. It was microservices, the tech equivalent of turning one giant pizza into bite-sized slices. Instead of one colossal system doing everything from streaming to recommendations, each piece of Netflix’s architecture became a specialist—one service handled streaming, another handled recommendations, another managed user data, and so on.

But microservices alone weren’t enough. What if one slice of pizza burns? Would the rest of the meal be ruined? Netflix wasn’t about to let a burnt crust take down the whole operation. That’s when they introduced the Circuit Breaker Pattern—just like a home electrical circuit that prevents a total blackout when one fuse blows. Their famous Hystrix tool allowed services to fail without taking down the entire platform. 

Fast-forward to today: Netflix isn’t just serving you movie marathons, it’s a digital powerhouse, an icon in platform engineering; it’s deploying new code thousands of times per day without breaking a sweat. They handle 208 million subscribers streaming over 1 billion hours of content every week. Trends in Platform engineering transformed Netflix into an application dev platform with self-service capabilities, supporting app developers and fostering a culture of continuous deployment.

Did Netflix bring order to chaos?

Netflix didn’t just solve its own problem. They blazed the trail for a movement: platform engineering. Now, every company wants a piece of that action. What Netflix did was essentially build an internal platform that developers could innovate without dealing with infrastructure headaches, a dream scenario for any application developer or app development company seeking seamless workflows.

And it’s not just for the big players like Netflix anymore. Across industries, companies are using platform engineering to create Internal Developer Platforms (IDPs)—one-stop shops for mobile application developers to create, test, and deploy apps without waiting on traditional IT. According to Gartner, 80% of organizations will adopt platform engineering by 2025 because it makes everything faster and more efficient, a game-changer for any mobile app developer or development software firm.

All anybody has to do is to make sure the tools are actually connected and working together. To make the most of it. That’s where modern trends like self-service platforms and composable architectures come in. You build, you scale, you innovate.achieving what mobile app dev and web-based development needs And all without breaking a sweat.

Source: getport.io

Is Mantra Labs Redefining Platform Engineering?

We didn’t just learn from Netflix’s playbook; we’re writing our own chapters in platform engineering. One example of this? Our work with one of India’s leading private-sector general insurance companies.

Their existing DevOps system was like Netflix’s old monolith: complex, clunky, and slowing them down. Multiple teams, diverse workflows, and a lack of standardization were crippling their ability to innovate. Worse yet, they were stuck in a ticket-driven approach, which led to reactive fixes rather than proactive growth. Observability gaps meant they were often solving the wrong problems, without any real insight into what was happening under the hood.

That’s where Mantra Labs stepped in. Mantra Labs brought in the pillars of platform engineering:

Standardization: We unified their workflows, creating a single source of truth for teams across the board.

Customization:  Our tailored platform engineering approach addressed the unique demands of their various application development teams.

Traceability: With better observability tools, they could now track their workflows, giving them real-time insights into system health and potential bottlenecks—an essential feature for web and app development and agile software development.

We didn’t just slap a band-aid on the problem; we overhauled their entire infrastructure. By centralizing infrastructure management and removing the ticket-driven chaos, we gave them a self-service platform—where teams could deploy new code without waiting in line. The results? Faster workflows, better adoption of tools, and an infrastructure ready for future growth.

But we didn’t stop there. We solved the critical observability gaps—providing real-time data that helped the insurance giant avoid potential pitfalls before they happened. With our approach, they no longer had to “hope” that things would go right. They could see it happening in real-time which is a major advantage in cross-platform mobile application development and cloud-based web hosting.

The Future of Platform Engineering: What’s Next?

As we look forward, platform engineering will continue to drive innovation, enabling companies to build scalable, resilient systems that adapt to future challenges—whether it’s AI-driven automation or self-healing platforms.

If you’re ready to make the leap into platform engineering, Mantra Labs is here to guide you. Whether you’re aiming for smoother workflows, enhanced observability, or scalable infrastructure, we’ve got the tools and expertise to get you there.

Cancel

Knowledge thats worth delivered in your inbox

Loading More Posts ...
Go Top
ml floating chatbot